After the FIA stewards launched an investigation into the scary incident between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen, the governing physique has now confirmed that the seven-time world champion escaped a possible penalty. F1Technical’s lead journalist Balazs Szabo stories from the Hungaroring.
Hamilton and Verstappen was locked in a combat for third place earlier than the second pit cease, however that battle ended early when Mercedes referred to as the Briton in for a tyre change.
However, the pair met once more within the closing phases of the race when Verstappen quickly closed in on Hamilton.
With eight laps left, Verstappen attacked Hamilton at Turn 1, making a dive from a good distance again.
The Dutchman locked up each entrance wheels and with Hamilton having turned in, Verstappen slid straight on and hit Hamilton’s right-front wheel.
The reigning champion went up within the air and off. He was in a position to proceed, however dropped behind the Ferrari of Charles Leclerc, and completed down in P5.
The stewards introduced that they might examine the incident, however they’ve now confirmed that the crash between the seven-time and three-time world champion stays unpunished.
The FIA’s full verdict learn: “The Stewards heard from the motive force of Car 1 (Max Verstappen), the motive force of Car 44 (Lewis Hamilton), staff representatives and reviewed positioning/marshalling system information, video, timing, telemetry, and in-car video proof.
“On the method to show 1, each Car 44 and Car 1 overtook Car 23. Car 44 returned to the racing line earlier than the braking zone and commenced to show into flip 1.
“Car 1 approached the flip sooner than on earlier laps (resulting from DRS) and braked on the similar level as beforehand. The driver of Car 1 argued that Car 44 was altering route beneath braking. The driver of Car 44 said that he was merely following his regular racing line (which was confirmed by examination of video and telemetry proof of earlier laps).
“It was clear that Car 1 locked up each entrance wheels on the method to show 1 previous to any influence occurring however lacking the conventional cornering line for a typical overtaking manoeuvre.
“The driver of Car 44 said that this was a racing incident, while the motive force of Car 1 argued that this was a case of adjusting route beneath braking.
“The Stewards do not consider this to be a typical case of “changing direction under braking” though it’s our willpower that the motive force of Car 44 may have executed extra to keep away from the collision.
“Accordingly we decide that no driver was predominantly responsible and determine to take no additional action.
“Competitors are reminded that they have the right to appeal certain decisions of the Stewards, in accordance with Article 15 of the FIA International Sporting Code and Chapter 4 of the FIA Judicial and Disciplinary Rules, within the applicable time limits.”
Source link
