Max Homa’s jump, Rory McIlroy and Patrick Reed controversy 

Check in each week for the unfiltered opinions of our writers and editors as they break down the most well liked matters within the sport, and be a part of the dialog by tweeting us @golf_com. This week, we focus on Max Homa’s win on the Farmers Insurance Open, Patrick Reed and Rory McIlroy’s ‘Teegate,’ Reed’s ‘Treegate’ and extra.

1. Max Homa received the Farmers Insurance Open to assert the sixth win of his PGA Tour profession, and fourth up to now 17 months. Are you stunned Homa rose from a powerful pack to win at Torrey Pines, and what’s made his recreation leap to the following stage over the previous couple of years?

Josh Sens, senior author (@joshsens): I’m positive a deep dive into the information might present how he’s executed it statistically. But the largest issue needs to be the one Homa has alluded to himself. Self-belief. There’s a momentum that comes with confidence, and you may see it and hear it in the best way he carries himself. There generally is a disconnect in public notion — the sense {that a} intelligent, relatable man on social media can’t even have a killer intuition. Homa’s retains getting keener. Given his report in California, we should always all be wanting ahead to the U.S. Open in Los Angeles.

James Colgan, assistant editor (@jamescolgan26): Nope! He’s simply actually freaking good at golf. It’s that straightforward. Homa has been among the best golfers on the planet over these previous eight months — and for that we are able to thank his newfound closing gene.

Zephyr Melton, assistant editor (@zephyrmelton): Sens stated it nicely — it’s all about self perception. Once Homa proved to himself he might win persistently, it turned a complete lot simpler to truly do it. And with a swing like his, I’d be stunned if he doesn’t win a complete lot extra within the years to come back.

Nick Piastowski, senior editor (@nickpia): Surprised that Homa received? Nah, that a lot. He’s good. The shock, although, is that Jon Rahm didn’t win. Torrey is dwelling to the Spaniard, and a two-over 74 is a stunner. But again to Homa. To me, we’ve develop into a bit conditioned now to the quick risers that we neglect that professional golf is tough and success takes some time. I am going again to this line within the splendidly written characteristic on Homa by our Dylan Dethier: “Alongside Tiger Woods, Homa’s favorite athlete is likely Kobe Bryant. And there’s a framed quote that used to hang beside Bryant’s locker: the Stonecutter’s Creed. ‘Look at a stonecutter hammering away at his rock, perhaps a hundred times without as much as a crack showing in it. Yet, at the hundred and first blow, it will split in two, and I know it was not the last blow that did it, but all that had gone before.’”

2. We had drama in Dubai, as Rory McIlroy ignored Patrick Reed’s try to say hiya on the driving vary, resulting in Reed playfully tossing a tee in McIlroy’s course. We discovered afterward that Reed’s lawyer had subpoenaed McIlroy on Christmas Eve. “I’m living in reality; I don’t know where he’s living,” McIlroy stated. “If I were in his shoes, I wouldn’t expect a hello or a handshake.” Reed told the Daily Mail that McIlroy acted like an “immature little child.” What’s your tackle Teegate?

Sens: Junior highschool on the driving vary – a clueless dude and a chilly shoulder. McIlroy shouldn’t be unsuitable, although. Reed clearly can’t learn a room. And he’s calling Rory a baby?

Colgan: Other than the abject hilariousness of all of it, I assumed it was fascinating that Reed pumped oxygen right into a story that was nearly lifeless with that “immature little child” remark. Maybe these LIVers have a little bit bit extra of a chip on their shoulder than they’re letting on publicly!

Melton: Reed projecting the “child” conduct onto McIlroy can be humorous if it weren’t so unhappy. The lack of self consciousness from Reed by no means ceases to amaze me. 

Piastowski: (Incredulous facial features.) 

3. Speaking of Reed, he discovered himself on the middle of an issue a couple of days after his incident with McIlroy, when he took an unplayable on the seventeenth gap of the Dubai match when his ball was caught in a tree. Reed recognized his ball by particular markings within the tree, so he wasn’t compelled to re-tee. The shot circulated on social media, and some thought his ball appeared to get caught in a unique tree than the one he dropped close to. According to the Guardian, “a further layer of complexity was added by the fact umpteen golf balls sat in the branches of the tree being inspected.” Let’s clear this up: any controversy right here, or nothing to see?

Sens: There had been guidelines officers available. Let’s belief their judgment over jury-by-social media. The drawback for Reed is the boy-who-cried-wolf factor. Past conduct issues, and Reed has a muddy sufficient observe report that nearly any  ruling he’s concerned in goes to boost some suspicions. In this case, I believe we will be snug that issues had been performed honest and sq..

Colgan: Reed’s argument was backed up by a crew of two guidelines officers and “several marshals.” Unless new data involves gentle, I believe we should always take that crew at their phrase.

Melton: Social media likes to get out the pitchforks for Reed, however this appears to be a nonstory. Those on the bottom had a greater look than any of us, and in the event that they suppose it’s kosher, then I’m inclined to consider them.

Piastowski: Was it dealt with by the guide? Yes. Could TV replay have helped level everybody concerned in the suitable course, no pun meant? Also sure. (And Golf Digest has reported that’s coming to the PGA Tour for guidelines conditions.) I’ll depart it at that. 

4. According to Sports Illustrated, LIV Golf CEO and commissioner Greg Norman has basically been promoted. Norman will soak up the function of LIV’s managing director, Majed Al-Sorour, who will take a step again because the circuit enters its second season. What does an elevated Norman function imply for the league?

Sens: Dropped titles. Resignations. Promotions. Pfft. My guess is that the identical decision-makers who’ve been pulling the strings will proceed pulling them. The significance appears extra in look than precise perform. Continuity of LIV within the title on the high of the masthead. And, for LIV critics, an opportunity to proceed pointing to Norman as a divisive determine with an ax to grind.

Colgan: I believe it means there’s a consolidation of energy atop the LIV hierarchy. Maybe that manifests itself in clearer organizational messaging in 2023, however one factor appears fairly clear: “Greg” isn’t going anyplace.

Melton: It means LIV feels OK going all in on The Shark’s management talents. Time will inform if that call will come to hang-out them.

Piastowski: I agree with Sens. It’s window dressing. Bottom line: The Saudi cash continues to be calling all of the necessary photographs right here. 

5. The first CBS golf broadcast of 2023 debuted on the Farmers with some noticeable adjustments. Obviously Trevor Immelman changing Nick Faldo was the largest, however we additionally noticed new digital camera angles, a walk-and-talk with a participant, and even an in-round interview with a contender’s mother. What had been your ideas on a number of the adjustments?

Sens: Like the Tour itself, the CBS broadcast has usually felt drained and complacent in recent times. These adjustments are welcome. A mic’d up Homa was particularly good. The extra these telecasts can showcase personalities whereas sharing precise insights, the higher. If a few of it feels gimmicky, so be it. These telecasts are ripe for a shakeup.

Colgan: I used to be inspired. The product was sooner, smarter, and labored a little bit bit tougher for the viewer. There are nonetheless too many commercials, however then once more, the Tour’s gotta pay for these new match purses someway!

Melton: It was an encouraging step, however there’s nonetheless a variety of room for enchancment. The golf broadcast product has been so stale for thus lengthy that any innovation is a welcome one — however let’s not get complacent. The TV product has a protracted methods to go earlier than I’m able to declare something “fixed.”

Piastowski: It was a change for the higher. Take that for what you’ll. But I’m going to flip the query round, to the readers, and ask this: What would make broadcast? I’m critically not being sarcastic or something right here; simply actually curious. I hear a variety of, ‘Oh, golf TV is so very bad,’ however I hardly ever hear options aside from, ‘Less commercials for my network golf’ and ‘More story-telling during a live tournament.’ So I wanna hear it. Email me at nick.piastowski@golf.com or ship a Twitter DM @nickpia. 

Golf Magazine

Subscribe To The Magazine

Subscribe